Methodology

How the scores work

Percentiles

For each normed test we look up the published reference row for your sex and age group, then place your result between the two nearest published percentiles using straight-line interpolation. If you're below the lowest or above the highest published percentile, we say so ("below the 10th", "above the 90th") rather than guess.

Ratings

Below 20th: Needs work · 20–39th: Fair · 40–59th: Average · 60–79th: Good · 80–89th: Very good · 90th+: Excellent. This follows the quintile framework proposed by Tomkinson et al. (2025), with a 90th-percentile "Excellent" tier added. For the chair stand at 60+, where only the 25th–75th percentile range is published, ratings are Below / Typical / Above range.

Strong After 40 Score (0–100)

The average of your percentiles across the normed tests you entered (VO2 max, grip strength, chair stand). For scoring only, results outside the published range count as the midpoint of the open band (e.g., below the 10th = 5, above the 90th = 95; for 25th/75th-only tables, below = 12.5, above = 87.5). Dead hang and ruck pace don't count because no validated norms exist.

The sources

FRIEND Registry (Kaminsky et al., 2022)

16,278 treadmill tests from apparently healthy US adults aged 20–89, 34 laboratories. Lab-measured VO2peak on a treadmill (cardiopulmonary exercise test). Smartwatch VO2 max values are estimates and can differ from lab values by several points.

Tomkinson et al., 2025 (2.4M adults, 69 countries)

2,405,863 adults aged 20–100+ from 100 studies, tested 2000 onward. Reference protocol: seated, elbow flexed, hydraulic dynamometer adjusted to hand size, 3 tries per hand, best single squeeze from either hand.

Rikli & Jones, 1999 (Senior Fitness Test, ages 60–94)

7,183 community-dwelling US adults aged 60–94 (267 sites, 21 states). Only the 25th and 75th percentiles (the "normal range") are used here. Scores below 25th or above 75th are reported as such, not as an exact percentile.

Rev Med Chile, 2025 (30s sit-to-stand, ages 18–80)

499 adults (287 women, 212 men) from six Chilean centres. Used only for ages 40–59 because the standard US norms (Rikli & Jones) start at 60. Small, non-US sample — treat as a rough guide.

Known limitations

Sources
  • Kaminsky LA, Arena R, Myers J, et al. Updated Reference Standards for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Measured with Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Data from the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND). Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2022;97(2):285–293. Table 3 (treadmill, RER ≥ 1.0). doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.08.020. Sample: 16,278 treadmill tests from apparently healthy US adults aged 20–89, 34 laboratories.
  • Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Rubín L, et al. International norms for adult handgrip strength: A systematic review of data on 2.4 million adults aged 20 to 100+ years from 69 countries and regions. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2025;14:101014. Table 2 (absolute handgrip strength, kg). doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101014. Sample: 2,405,863 adults aged 20–100+ from 100 studies, tested 2000 onward.
  • Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60–94. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 1999;7:162–181. Normal range (25th–75th percentile) as reproduced in the OARSI Recommended Performance-Based Tests manual (2013), p. 22. doi:10.1123/japa.7.2.162. Sample: 7,183 community-dwelling US adults aged 60–94 (267 sites, 21 states).
  • 30 Seconds Sit-to-Stand Test: Reference Values for the Chilean Population. Revista Médica de Chile. 2025;153(5):329–339. Table 2 (percentiles 2.5, 25, 50, 75, 97.5). doi:10.4067/s0034-98872025000500329. Sample: 499 adults (287 women, 212 men) from six Chilean centres.